Politics · 9 sources ⚠ Andekha — no coverage found on the Right in our feed sample
'Spend More Time In India, Respect Seniors': Kiren Rijiju's 7 Suggestions For Rahul Gandhi
Coverage by lean
44% Lean Left56% Centre0% Right
Left 4
Centre 5
'Spend More Time In India, Respect Seniors': Kiren Rijiju's 7 Suggestions For Rahul GandhiFree Press Journal1 of 5
Right 0
No coverage found on this side
One headline per side, the first Trikon holds. Every outlet is listed below.
Left · 4
New Indian Express · Lean Left
'Spend more time in India': Rijiju lists seven conditions for Congress to win more MPs, takes dig at Rahul Gandhi
◈ Express Publications (Madurai), Manoj Kumar Sonthalia
The Hindu · Lean Left
Spend more time in India: Rijiju takes jibe at Rahul, list conditions for Congress to ‘win more MPs’
◈ Kasturi & Sons Ltd, The Hindu Group
The Morung Express · Lean Left
FM Sitharaman challenges Rahul Gandhi to debate in Parliament, not on social media
◈ Aküm Longchari and founding collective; board-run
The Federal · Lean Left
Rijiju takes swipe at Rahul over challenge to PM Modi for open debate on foreign help
◈ New Generation Media Corporation (P. Sathyanarayanan)
Centre · 5
Free Press Journal · Centre
'Spend More Time In India, Respect Seniors': Kiren Rijiju's 7 Suggestions For Rahul Gandhi
◈ Indian National Press (Bombay), Karnani family
Pratidin Time · Centre
‘Roses Are For Valentine’s Day, Not Diwali’: Assam CM Takes Dig At Rahul Gandhi
◈ Sadin-Pratidin Group (founded 1988 by Jayanta Baruah; led by Rishi Baruah)
Nagaland Post · Centre
Rahul now dares PM to an open debate on ‘anti-national’ charge against Opposition
◈ Geoffrey Yaden
The Assam Tribune · Centre
Rekha Gupta throws open challenge to Rahul Gandhi for parliament debate
◈ Assam Tribune Pvt Ltd, Baruah family
The Tribune · Centre
‘RSS chief can be judge’: Rahul Gandhi dares PM Modi to debate ‘foreign links’
◈ The Tribune Trust
Right · 0
No coverage found on this side.
Verify with IFCN fact-checkers →Fact CrescendoIFCN ↗Alt NewsIFCN ↗BOOMIFCN ↗FactlyIFCN ↗Google Fact Check ↗