Politics · 12 sources ⚠ Andekha — no coverage found on the Right in our feed sample
2 Stanzas of Vande Matram ‘Anti-National’, Says Amit Shah
Coverage by lean
41% Left24% Centre35% Right
Left 7
Centre 4
Right 6
One headline per side, the first Trikon holds. Every outlet is listed below.
Left · 7
Deccan Herald · Lean Left
Amit Shah slams Congress over two-stanza Vande Mataram rendition, party says BJP is trying to divert attention from key issues
Hindustan Times · Lean Left
‘New Muslim League’: Nitin Nabin attacks Congress as Vande Mataram row escalates, Opposition hits back
Indian Express · Lean Left
‘New Muslim League’: BJP slams Congress decision to recite only 2 stanzas of Vande Mataram
Scroll.in · Lean Left
Congress says it will sing only first two stanzas of ‘Vande Mataram’
The Federal · Lean Left
Amit Shah calls Congress decision on Vande Mataram 'anti-national'
New Indian Express · Lean Left
Kapil Sibal asks Shah if Modi, Vajpayee sang full Vande Mataram
The Hindu · Lean Left
Sibal asks Shah if Modi as CM, Vajpayee as PM sang full version of Vande Mataram
Centre · 4
Deccan Chronicle · Centre
Cong.’s Two-Stanza Vande Mataram Stand Anti-National: Shah
Greater Kashmir · Centre
Congress’ decision to stick to 2 paras of Vande Mataram 'appeasement,' defiance of law, says Amit Shah
The Shillong Times · Centre
Vande Mataram row escalates in UP as BJP, Congress, SP, AAP trade charges
Nagaland Post · Centre
Amit Shah slams Congress two-para Vande Mataram decision
Right · 6
News18 · Lean Right
Vande Mataram Row: Congress Limits Singing To 2 Stanzas, BJP Alleges Minority Appeasement | News18
Republic World · Lean Right
'Politics of Appeasement Will No Longer Work: Amit Shah's Attack on Congress for Opposing Recitation of Full Vande Mataram
Zee News · Right
Sharmila Tagore says ‘Vande Mataram’ is difficult to recite for those who believe in one God
Times of India · Lean Right
Vande Mataram row: Amit Shah asks people to rally against Congress
The Print · Lean Right
Cong calls BJP leaders ‘fraudulent nationalists’ as Vande Mataram row rages
Verify with IFCN fact-checkers →