Judiciary · 7 sources ⚠ Andekha — no coverage found on the Left in our feed sample
Definition Row: Pending ID Act Cases To Follow 1978 Ruling, SC Retains Iyer’s ‘Triple Test’
Coverage by lean
50% Left20% Centre30% Right
Left 5
SC’s 5:4 verdict refines 48-yr-old ‘industry’ test but protects pending disputesHindustan Times1 of 5
Centre 2
Expansive ‘industry’ definition in 1978 verdict not to apply to 2020 Code: SCThe Assam Tribune1 of 2
Right 3
One headline per side, the first Trikon holds. Every outlet is listed below.
Left · 5
Hindustan Times · Lean Left
SC’s 5:4 verdict refines 48-yr-old ‘industry’ test but protects pending disputes
The Hindu · Lean Left
Supreme Court scraps worker-friendly 1978 ‘industry’ precedent for new labour code
Deccan Herald · Lean Left
What is ‘industry’? Supreme Court modifies definition laid down in 1978 judgement
New Indian Express · Lean Left
'Risks weakening worker safeguards': Congress on SC's recent industry definition judgement
National Herald · Left
Congress flags SC’s ‘industry’ ruling, warns of weaker worker safeguards
Centre · 2
The Assam Tribune · Centre
Expansive ‘industry’ definition in 1978 verdict not to apply to 2020 Code: SC
Deccan Chronicle · Centre
Definition Row: Pending ID Act Cases To Follow 1978 Ruling, SC Retains Iyer’s ‘Triple Test’
Right · 3
Business Standard · Lean Right
SC retains 1978 industry test for old disputes, leaves new labour code open
Times of India · Lean Right
SC upholds broad definition of industry, only for pending cases
Verify with IFCN fact-checkers →